ESP8266 - don’t work properly after increase code size
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 3:51 pmHi All,
Let me explain, I'm using PlatformIO to write my code and I did some quick test with a ESP8266 and they worked without problem (I could connect and use it without problem).
But after to increase the code with the real behavior that I want, it stop to work…or well… it doesn’t work properly…
I’m using ESP8266 512k, and I’m using spiff data and C++ code, basically after to push it the wifi is detected but when I try to connect the network disappears (it seems to switch the wifi off), or sometimes it spent a lot of time getting the IP and suddenly it stops and restart the wifi network.
When I upload the code I see this information:
I guess that probably I’m in the limit of the memory usage… I don’t remember very well, but I think that I’ve read something about it.
So do you have any suggestion?, maybe something to debug or profiling the code?
Thanks in advance!!
Let me explain, I'm using PlatformIO to write my code and I did some quick test with a ESP8266 and they worked without problem (I could connect and use it without problem).
But after to increase the code with the real behavior that I want, it stop to work…or well… it doesn’t work properly…
I’m using ESP8266 512k, and I’m using spiff data and C++ code, basically after to push it the wifi is detected but when I try to connect the network disappears (it seems to switch the wifi off), or sometimes it spent a lot of time getting the IP and suddenly it stops and restart the wifi network.
When I upload the code I see this information:
Code: Select all
…
Building .pioenvs/esp01/firmware.bin
Retrieving maximum program size .pioenvs/esp01/firmware.elf
Checking size .pioenvs/esp01/firmware.elf
Memory Usage -> http://bit.ly/pio-memory-usage
DATA: [==== ] 44.0% (used 36016 bytes from 81920 bytes)
PROGRAM: [======= ] 74.2% (used 322224 bytes from 434160 bytes)
…I guess that probably I’m in the limit of the memory usage… I don’t remember very well, but I think that I’ve read something about it.
So do you have any suggestion?, maybe something to debug or profiling the code?
Thanks in advance!!