ESP8266 Community Forum

- Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:46 pm #4424 Forgot to mention that there is another bug (which is present in the original code btw) you should read 1 byte less than the size of the buffer if you set
recv_buf[recbytes] = 0;
In case you receive 128 bytes you will write at position 129, out of bound.
Would be better
while ((recbytes = read(client_sock , recv_buf, 127)) > 0) {

- Tue Dec 09, 2014 5:20 pm #4437 thank you. i missed out "\n" char. some times i need a break for see

Forgot to mention that there is another bug (which is present in the original code btw) you should read 1 byte less than the size of the buffer if you set
recv_buf[recbytes] = 0;
In case you receive 128 bytes you will write at position 129, out of bound.
Would be better
while ((recbytes = read(client_sock , recv_buf, 127)) > 0) {

ESP8266.com Moderator
Lets get the party started and +1

[url=https://www.banggood.com/custlink/KvGGhGF4wG[/url]

I like ESP8266 and ESP8285 and ESP32