- Sun Sep 07, 2014 11:51 am
#306
Let's nail down entire competition. Nothing is known about those chips yet, except that they're made by the company who harasses people who faithfully obey company's own licensing terms: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=n ... px=MTczNDU
- Sun Sep 07, 2014 11:58 am
#308
Qualcomm is a total pain to work with. Basically if you aren't going to spend $1M buying chips from them they don't want you for a customer.
- Sun Sep 07, 2014 12:01 pm
#309
Qualcom ATH9K also uses Xtensa.
https://github.com/qca/open-ath9k-htc-firmware
https://github.com/qca/open-ath9k-htc-firmware
- Sun Sep 07, 2014 12:17 pm
#312
BTW, it looks like there are redistributable (MIT license) xtos sources in there:
https://github.com/qca/open-ath9k-htc-f ... s/src/xtos
jonsmirl wrote:Qualcom ATH9K also uses Xtensa.
https://github.com/qca/open-ath9k-htc-firmware
BTW, it looks like there are redistributable (MIT license) xtos sources in there:
https://github.com/qca/open-ath9k-htc-f ... s/src/xtos
