Your new topic does not fit any of the above??? Check first. Then post here. Thanks.

Moderator: igrr

User avatar
By rudy
#54916 I have found the different browsers have different behaviours. And the way they process things can screw up the ESP8266. I have seen that but typically it is when there are a number of files requested all at the same time. I'm surprised that you are seeing this with only one file.

At this point I think a tool like Wireshark is your best bet. That way you can see all the interactions and not just the end result.
User avatar
By Sn4k3r
#54931 It seems that it isn't browser behaviour because IE, opera, chrome, firefox gives the same result. Also it does not depend on which file downloads, always about 2.6Kb. I think that something wrong with my PC. I'll retry on work's PC.
I think Wireshark good tool for me, but there is one problem: I don't know what should be and so I can't understand what's wrong. I'll try understand what's going on, but it seems that it'll take a lot of time for me.
User avatar
By rudy
#54959
I'll try understand what's going on, but it seems that it'll take a lot of time for me.


Yeah. That's the part I hate. All the things you need to learn just to get past one point.
User avatar
By Sn4k3r
#54976 There is something wrong with 3rd segment.
There is trace: http://shot.qip.ru/00QUtl-4SNS8HX1s/
The 3rd segment has an error (IPv4 total length exceeds packet length (1500 bytes), but it 1700) http://shot.qip.ru/00QUtl-3SNS8HX1u/
So the 3rd segment not captured http://shot.qip.ru/00QUtl-2SNS8HX1v/
I don't know what does it mean (not counting the fact that max MTU shoild be 1500)
I think that a mistake in the core.
Does somebody use Win 7? Do you have the same problem or not?