PhilTilson wrote:Phil should it not be 0.63 which is one time constant as opposed to 0.69 ?
So it seems!
Funny how you have something in the back of your mind from years ago and it turns out to be wrong! Let's be nit-picky - 0.63212 !!
I'm not even sure that the method would work, but it's worth a try.
Phil
Haha Sorry mate I am a stickler for detail. I think the method is good but you know what I would do is use a capacitance meter lol
Dans